Monday, December 8, 2008

Not the man the lefties wanted

OK now that the election is over and I managed to come out of my coma from the results, here is some recent news from LNN.
Turns out the liberal nutcases in America are angry with their "Change the nation" leader.
Even though P.E. Obama did say he would unite the country, the liberal left thought this would be by totally injecting socialist values across the board.-LNN



From Politico-
Liberals are growing increasingly nervous – and some just flat-out angry – that President-elect Barack Obama seems to be stiffing them on Cabinet jobs and policy choices.
Obama has reversed pledges to immediately repeal tax cuts for the wealthy and take on Big Oil. He’s hedged his call for a quick drawdown in Iraq. And he’s stocking his White House with anything but stalwarts of the left.
Now some are shedding a reluctance to puncture the liberal euphoria at being rid of President George W. Bush to say, in effect, that the new boss looks like the old boss.
(That’s Washington folks…you never learn-LNN)
"He has confirmed what our suspicions were by surrounding himself with a centrist to right cabinet. But we do hope that before it's all over we can get at least one authentic progressive appointment," said Tim Carpenter, national director of the Progressive Democrats of America.
OpenLeft blogger Chris Bowers went so far as to issue this plaintive plea: "Isn't there ever a point when we can get an actual Democratic administration?"
(Guess what, he is acting like a true Democrat, not a socialist lunatic, as with the likes of Bowers and Carpenter.-LNN)
Even supporters make clear they’re on the lookout for backsliding. "There’s a concern that he keep his basic promises and people are going to watch him," said Roger Hickey, a co-founder of Campaign for America’s Future.
Obama insists he hasn’t abandoned the goals that made him feel to some like a liberal savior. But the left’s bill of particulars against Obama is long, and growing.
Obama drew rousing applause at campaign events when he vowed to tax the windfall profits of oil companies. As president-elect, Obama says he won’t enact the tax. (Smart move, that raises fuel prices-LNN)
Obama’s pledge to repeal the Bush tax cuts and redistribute that money to the middle class made him a hero among Democrats (SOCIALIST Dems, there IS a difference-LNN) who said the cuts favored the wealthy. But now he’s struck a more cautious stance on rolling back tax cuts for people making over $250,000 a year, signaling he’ll merely let them expire as scheduled at the end of 2010.
Obama’s post-election rhetoric on Iraq and choices for national security team have some liberal Democrats even more perplexed. As a candidate, Obama defined and separated himself from his challengers by highlighting his opposition to the war in Iraq from the start. He promised to begin to end the war on his first day in office.
Now Obama’s says that on his first day in office he will begin to "design a plan for a responsible drawdown," as he told NBC’s "Meet the Press" Sunday. Obama has also filled his national security positions with supporters of the Iraq war: Sen. Hillary Clinton, who voted to authorize force in Iraq, as his secretary of state; and President George W. Bush’s defense secretary, Robert Gates, continuing in the same role.
(Another smart move that the liberal nutcases still to this day don’t get why we won’t cut and run-LNN)
The central premise of the left’s criticism is direct – don’t bite the hand that feeds, Mr. President-elect. The Internet that helped him so much during the election is lighting up with irritation and critiques.
Now it’s Obama’s Cabinet moves that are drawing the most fire. It’s not just that he’s picked Clinton and Gates. It’s that liberal Democrats say they’re hard-pressed to find one of their own on Obama’s team so far – particularly on the economic side, where people like Tim Geithner and Lawrence Summers are hardly viewed as pro-labor. (Can we say the Big 3 money needs are half the problem, with THEIR LABOR costs?-LNN)
That’s a view that seems to have kept some progressive leaders holding their fire. There are signs of a struggle within the left wing of the Democratic Party about whether it’s just too soon to criticize Obama -- and if there’s really anything to complain about just yet.
Case in point: One of the Campaign for America’s Future blogs commented on Obama’s decision not to tax oil companies’ windfall profits saying, "Between this move and the move to wait to repeal the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, it seems like the Obama team is buying into the right-wing frame that raising any taxes - even those on the richest citizens and wealthiest corporations - is bad for the economy."
(DUH-ECO101, take the class, you’ll learn something-LNN)

2 comments:

  1. C'mon, now, this is exactly the man the lefties wanted. He ran in the primary as everything but a 9/11 Truther and after he'd out liberaled Hillary Clinton he TRIED to convince middle America that he wasn't reeeeaally that bad.

    Now his handlers in the MSM are going to try to paint him as a moderate. This is all a part of their template and its designed to pre-empt the "liberal" labels in 2012. Don't be fooled.

    The man could be twenty paces to the right of the MSM and he'd still be a thousand to the left of us "bitter clingers."

    --Nick
    www.RightMichigan.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Don't get me wrong here Nick, BHO is still goose stepping from the left. My point is he is not as extreme to left as his electorate though he was going to be, just by his appointments thus far. And they are pretty upset. I'm loving their bitterness!!!
    We'll see once he is sworn in just how much he yanks the "wheel" of America to the left.

    ReplyDelete